- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:28:09 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]: See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0037.html [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin -------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of: Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Paul Downey, Dale Moberg, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Rebecca Bergersen, Hugo Haas, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Approval of minutes: - Mar 24 telcon [.1] [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0087/20050324-ws-desc-minutes.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Review of Action items [.1]. AIs are becoming a problem. Suggest a new process: 1) Separate editorial actions from others 2) Assign a due date to each action Outstanding editorial work: HOLD 2004-09-16: Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec, except the frag-id which will move within media-type reg appendix. ? 2004-09-16: Editors to fix paragraph 6-9 of section 2.1.1 moved into 2.1.2 which talks about the syntax. ? 2004-10-14: Editors to add a statement like: The Style property may constrain both input and output, however a particular style may constrain in only one direction. In Section 2.4.1.1 of Part 1. ? 2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists ? 2005-01-13: Part 1 Editors to incorporate the text at 2004Dec/0022.html. ? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to call out the difference between WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 in respect to single interface per service, and indicate alternatives ? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to rewrite ONMR as Best practice. ? 2005-03-10: Editors to check URI and schema references in Part 1 Assign dates to (or retire) the following AIs: ? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going. ? 2004-09-02: Bijan to create stylesheet to generate a table of components and properties. ? 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith proposal using an extension namespace. (LC54) ? 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing the compromise proposal on formal objections. ? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal and email it to the list as a response to the objection. ? 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for the purpose of interoperability testing. ? 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specific text for the editors (LC18). ? 2005-02-17: Jacekk to help Bijan advance the RDF mapping work ? 2005-03-03: Asir to double check the subissues of 76d to see if they should be raised as issues and to do so. ? 2005-03-10: Anish and Umit will respond to comments on media type description documents with our actions. ? 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still relavant ? 2005-03-10: Marsh to troll minutes looking for more CR criteria. DONE 2005-03-17: WG members review MTD by next week. ? 2005-03-24: Charlton to propose solution for Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) ? 2005-03-24: Charlton to propose text for LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0, per Asir's proposed resolution ? 2005-03-24: DaveO to dig up his old proposal for URL-encoding namespaces, for Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded ? 2005-03-24: DaveO to figure out when/why multpart/related got dropped from HTML binding section ? 2005-03-24: DaveO to produce HTTP binding section for primer ? 2005-03-24: DaveO to propose text for Issue LC47: describing the HTTP error text for faults ? 2005-03-24: DaveO to query MS whether they would support part of the HTTP binding if divided ? 2005-03-24: Roberto to draft proposal to split HTTP binding into 3 bindings [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Administrivia a. Upcoming FTF dates: - April 21-22, Mountain View (Microsoft) Registration [.1] Logistics [.2] - May 30 - June 1 Berlin [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdwgf2f0504/ [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. Primer [.1] - What ever happened to issues 93 and 107? [.2, .3] - The following primer sections are due today! + Section 7.2 Features and Properties (Glen) + Section 7.3 Import mechanism and authoring style (Arthur) + Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the Same Service (David) + Section 7.5 Versioning and Service Equivalency (Paul) + Section 7.8 Operation Style and RPC (Umit) + Section 7.11 Service References (Arthur) + Section 7.12 XML Schema Examples (Paul) + Section 7.13 Multiple In-Line Schemas (Arthur) + Section 7.14 The schemaLocation Attribute (Arthur) + DONE: Section 7.15 Mapping to RDF and Semantic Web (Bijan Jacek) - Sections marked as "at risk" if no volunteer can be found: + Section 7.7 Security Considerations - Does Dan C's issue need to be tracked? [.4] [.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.html [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x93 [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x107 [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Mar/0004.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. Media Type Description issues [.1] - Larry's response to Issue 268 [.2] - Joe Fialli has three comments [.3] - I18N re-review [.4] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0063.html [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0017.html [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2005Mar/0015.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2] - Define "WSDL 2.0 document" [.3] - schemaLocation [.4] - Service Reference problem [.5] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/ [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/ [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Mar/0009.html [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0093.html [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0088.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. Issue LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 [.1] - "When {http version}="1.0" and {http transfer coding} claim is made, is that an error or should the processors safely ignore it?" - Waiting for text from Charlton. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC28 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. Issue LC47: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults [.1] - "When binding a fault to the HTTP protocol, we need to be able to specify the error text in addition to the HTTP status code." - Waiting for text from DaveO. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC47 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 10. Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) [.1] - '&' (WSDL) vs. '&' or ';' (XForms) - Waiting for text from Charlton [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69a ------------------------------------------------------------------ 11. Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (b) [.1] - XForms supports "multpart/related", WSDL doesn't mention it. - Waiting for text from DaveO. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69b ------------------------------------------------------------------ 12. Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [.1] - "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized." - Waiting for proposal from DaveO. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a ------------------------------------------------------------------ 13. Issue LC75u: Add wsdl:documentation to the component model [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75u ------------------------------------------------------------------ 14. Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 15. Issue LC83: The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component Nesting [.1] - Parent property [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC83 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 16. Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [.1] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 17. Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue - Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an extension [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC54 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 18. Issue LC84b: [.1] - Hugo's draft proposal [.2] [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ 19. Issue LC74: Idle question [.1] - Can WSDL 2.0 import WSDL 1.0? - Note that the resolution to LC5e [.2] defines WSDL Document as WSDL 2.0 namespace. - Options: a) No. Spec (with LC5e resolution) is clear enough. b) No. Specifically note that i*ing 1.1 docs is not supported. c) Yes. Change spec to define that this is possible, though how to turn a WSDL 1.1 doc into WSDL 2.0 components is not defined. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74 [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC5e ------------------------------------------------------------------ 20. Issue LC75w: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (w) [.1] - Relax requirement that include href must be dereferencable. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75w ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:28:13 UTC