www-ws-desc@w3.org from March 2005 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2005

Minutes, 31 March 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
Proposal for Resolution of LC99.: Message Reference Component is Underspecified Arthur Ryman
Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service David Booth
Re: RDF primer text for 5.15: RDF mapping David Booth
FW: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" paul.downey@bt.com
RE: LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 Tom Jordahl
RE: New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) Tom Jordahl
Re: LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 Charlton Barreto
LC76d: My Action Item Asir Vedamuthu
LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) Charlton Barreto
RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names John Kaputin
Re: LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 Hugo Haas

Wednesday, 30 March 2005

New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) Yalcinalp, Umit
LC28: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 Charlton Barreto
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Amelia A Lewis
RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Asir Vedamuthu
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Arthur Ryman
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Arthur Ryman
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Amelia A Lewis
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Anish Karmarkar
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Amelia A Lewis
Re: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Anish Karmarkar
FW: Agenda, 24 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Arthur Ryman
RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? paul.downey@bt.com
Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Arthur Ryman

Monday, 28 March 2005

Re: Yahoo! WebService WSDL Arthur Ryman
Re: Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction Arthur Ryman
Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction Arthur Ryman

Friday, 25 March 2005

Minutes, 24 March 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
Re: WSD Issue 275 closed Henry S. Thompson
Re: WSD Issue 274 closed Henry S. Thompson
Re: WSD Issue 276 closed Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 24 March 2005

RDF primer text for 5.15: RDF mapping Jacek Kopecky

Wednesday, 23 March 2005

Re: Yahoo! WebService WSDL Dan Diephouse
Agenda, 24 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
RE: Yahoo! WebService WSDL Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 22 March 2005

Yahoo! WebService WSDL Michael Salisbury

Friday, 18 March 2005

Re: Minutes, 17 March 2005 WS Description telcon Jean-Jacques Moreau
WSD Issue 272 is Closed Yalcinalp, Umit

Thursday, 17 March 2005

Minutes, 17 March 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
RE: WSD Issue 268 Closed Tom Jordahl
LC105 Recap Arthur Ryman
RE: OPTIONS, HEAD, et. al.? David Orchard
WSD Issue 273 is closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 270 is closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 266 is closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 263 is closed Yalcinalp, Umit

Wednesday, 16 March 2005

WSD Issue 262 is Closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 261 is closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 260 is closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 259 is Closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 258 is Closed Yalcinalp, Umit
RE: WSD Issue 268 Closed Larry Masinter
WSD Issue 279 Closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 268 Closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 280 is Closed Yalcinalp, Umit
WSD Issue 278 Closed Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 15 March 2005

Agenda, 17 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 14 March 2005

OPTIONS, HEAD, et. al.? Kendall Clark
introduction Kendall Clark

Friday, 11 March 2005

RE: WSD Issue 265 closed Klotz, Leigh
WSD Issue 274 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 254 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 277 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 276 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 275 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 267 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 269 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 265 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 264 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 257 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 256 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 255 closed Anish Karmarkar
WSD Issue 253 closed Anish Karmarkar

Thursday, 10 March 2005

Re: Questions on Binding Operation Changes Arthur Ryman
expectedContentType replaced with expectedContentTypes Anish Karmarkar
Re: Questions on Binding Operation Changes Roberto Chinnici
Proposal to address LC75g Roberto Chinnici
Minutes, 10 March 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
Re: WSDL Action Item: Review LC75s Table Jean-Jacques Moreau
RE: Questions on Binding Operation Changes Liu, Kevin
RE: Proposed Primer Text to Show Fault Reuse and Fault Codes Liu, Kevin
RE: Agenda, 9 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
Questions on Binding Operation Changes Arthur Ryman
Proposed Primer Text to Show Fault Reuse and Fault Codes Arthur Ryman
RE: Agenda, 9 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Asir Vedamuthu
LC113: Additional Info Asir Vedamuthu
Re: Agenda, 9 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Why do we have a component model? Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Why do we have a component model? Sanjiva Weerawarana
New version of media types doc available Anish Karmarkar

Wednesday, 9 March 2005

Agenda, 9 March 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
RE: Why do we have a component model? paul.downey@bt.com

Tuesday, 8 March 2005

RE: Why do we have a component model? Yalcinalp, Umit
Minutes, 3-4 March 2005 WS Description FTF Jonathan Marsh
Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia
RE: Why do we have a component model? Jonathan Marsh
Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia
Re: Why do we have a component model? Arthur Ryman
Re: Why do we have a component model? Sanjiva Weerawarana
Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia
RE: Why do we have a component model? paul.downey@bt.com
Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia

Monday, 7 March 2005

RE: Why do we have a component model? Yalcinalp, Umit
Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia
Re: Why do we have a component model? Arthur Ryman
Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia
Re: Why do we have a component model? Jean-Jacques Moreau

Friday, 4 March 2005

Re: Why do we have a component model? Bijan Parsia
Why do we have a component model? Anish Karmarkar

Thursday, 3 March 2005

Re: Summary of decision tree for Addr/Desc groups Sanjiva Weerawarana
Updated 8AM start: Agenda, 3-4 March 2005 WS Desc FTF, Boston Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 2 March 2005

New editors draft of the media types doc checked in Anish Karmarkar
Re: WSDL Action Item: Review LC75s Table Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: WSDL Action Item: Review LC75s Table David Booth

Tuesday, 1 March 2005

FW: Summary of decision tree for Addr/Desc groups Glen Daniels

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:56:55 UTC