Re: Notational conventions


Some of our schemas do show the location of extension elements (like the 
update I recently made for <types>). I am in favour of simplifying the 
pseudo-schemas by removing the extension points and adding the statement, 
and volunteer to do this.

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text:

"Jonathan Marsh" <> 
Sent by:
07/26/2005 05:12 PM


Notational conventions

The WS-A WG has added a statement "Pseudo schemas do not include
extensibility points for brevity" to their notational conventions [1].
Except for that new statement, that text is identical to ours [2]. I
believe it would be beneficial to add the statement to our notational
conventions section(s) as well.

I propose this be treated editorial and done prior to LC publication.
But if it doesn't happen we'll track it as an editorial issue during the
next LC.


Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2005 21:31:34 UTC