RE: LC124

• From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
• Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:41:48 +0100
• To: <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>, <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709E4B8@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>

Umit

> I do not really like to talk about LC124 CR testing as if the direction
> on LC124 is a done deal. AFAIK I can read the minutes of today's
> concall, LC124 is still alive and kicking. 

Sorry - I didn't mean to give the impression that LC124 was
a 'done deal', it obviously isn't. My point about CR being that's where 
difficulties in implementation really come to a head.

Paul

Received on Friday, 8 July 2005 07:41:54 UTC