RE: Requirements Analysis

Nope, I resolved all those before sending it out, so there aren't any
orange ones left.  Guess I forgot to take it out of the legend.  Sorry
for the confusion!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:jacek.kopecky@deri.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:23 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Requirements Analysis
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> it looks great, I'm only puzzled by the promise of "items needing to
be
> completed highlighted in orange" of which I found none. Is it because
> there are no such items or is it that the orange highlighting got lost
> somewhere?
> 
> Just making sure I don't miss something here,
> 
> Jacek
> 
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 11:39 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > I've written up, and enclose here, an analysis of where we came out
on
> > fulfilling the requirements as last documented by the WG.  I'll
> > provide a link to this to the Director as part of the CR call
agenda.
> > I've also highlighted a few of the requirements as particularly
> > interesting - either because they were not fulfilled, were partially
> > fulfilled, or generated particularly interesting discussion.
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments welcome!
> >
> >
> >
> >                                           <From>Jonathan Marsh</
From>
> >
> >                               <ReplyTo>jmarsh@microsoft.com</
ReplyTo>
> >
> >   <RelatesTo>http://spaces.msn.com/members/auburnmarshes/</
RelatesTo>
> >
> >
> >
> >

Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:52:38 UTC