- From: IC Dept.- MIT-Maqbool Al Maimani <maqbool@oas.com.om>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:39:49 +0400
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Dear All Where can I get the latest development on WSDL, UDDI, SOAP and XAML. Moreover, I want to know the latest on the Semantic Web Services. Also, I would like to get the open research points and issues on web services and semantic web services Regards MAQBOOL -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kendall Clark Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:20 PM To: Hugo Haas Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; Eric Prud'hommeaux Subject: Re: Data Access WG questions about WSDL On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:46:16PM +0200, Hugo Haas wrote: > Oh, you're right, the multipart style is missing here, and it says: > > The localPart of the element's QName MUST be the same as the > Interface Operation component's name. > > I am actually unsure about the motivation and need for this > requirement of the style. Indeed. > > query1: GET, IRI style, application/sparql-results+xml > > query2: GET, IRI style, application/rdf+xml > > query3: POST, multipart style, application/sparql-results+xml > > query4: POST, multipart style, application/rdf+xml > > > > Wow, now *that's* confusing. And ugly. Really, really ugly. > > Well, actually, you could have only 2 operations, and 2 bindings of > those, one for GET and one for POST, supposing that query[1-4] are the > same input message. They are semantically the same input message, of course, but they aren't the same in the sense that matters. So, we'd have to have 4. Unless you can have multiple styles, which it seems you can. That helps. Cheers, Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 04:41:29 UTC