- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:33:33 +0200
- To: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 11:33:38 UTC
Hi Arthur. * Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> [2005-08-24 14:58-0400] > The specification that defines the Extension Type System must also define > a URI for it. Recall that all extensions have a URI. I think that we should point to the part of the spec where it says that a specification that defines the Extension Type System must also define an IRI for it. As it was not obvious to me, I would expect other people outside the WG to have a similar issue. > I'm fine with using IRI instead of URI. Great. Cheers, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 11:33:38 UTC