Re: wsdlx:interface and wsdlx:binding and WS-Addressing 1.0

Hugo,

I recall that someone in our group who was also in the WS-A group 
volunteered to contact them. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
08/24/2005 08:48 AM

To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc

Subject
wsdlx:interface and wsdlx:binding and WS-Addressing 1.0






When closing LC117[1], we had a proposal which, in addition to
introducing wsdlx:interface and wsdlx:binding, was including
contacting the Web Services Addressing Working Group about those two
attributes.

Presumably, we wanted to have them to consider using those instead of
their own wsaw:InterfaceName[2]. Note that we define pointers to
interface and binding, and they define some to interface, service and
endpoint, and ours are WSDL 2.0 specific.

I don't see any email about the wsdlx namespace in their mailing
list[3]. Did we ever contact them about that?

As they are approaching LC with their WSDL document, and we are
approaching the end of the review period with ours, it seems like an
appropriate time to contact them about it if we didn't do it at the
time.

Cheers,

Hugo

  1. 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/att-0002/20050531-ws-desc-minutes.html#item00

  2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-wsdl-20050413/#refmetadatfromepr
  3. 
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-ws-addressing&index-type=t&keywords=wsdlx&search=Search

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/