www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2005 by date

Saturday, 30 April 2005

• Primer draft ready for review Liu, Kevin

Friday, 29 April 2005

• Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed Yalcinalp, Umit
• WSDL 2.0 Interface tests Lawrence Mandel

Thursday, 28 April 2005

• Clarification Text for Last Call Issue 59d - wsdlLocation Tom Jordahl
• Minutes, 28 April 2005 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Add link to Primer to do list in group web page Liu, Kevin

Wednesday, 27 April 2005

• RE: Agenda, 28 April 2005 WS Desc telcon Liu, Kevin

Tuesday, 26 April 2005

• Re: wsdl primer example uses POST to check availability? Liu, Kevin
• RE: Agenda, 28 April 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Agenda, 28 April 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes, 21-22 April 2005 WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Proposal for LC80: Contribution of Extensions to the Componen t Model Rogers, Tony

Monday, 25 April 2005

• Bindings: what happens when {address} is absent? Hugo Haas

Saturday, 23 April 2005

• Primer section for MEP examples Liu, Kevin

Friday, 22 April 2005

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• Re: LC77a Namespaced elements and urlformencoded Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Matt Long
• RE: LC54 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• LC75m DONE Arthur Ryman
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• Re: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Anish Karmarkar

Thursday, 21 April 2005

• RE: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Rogers, Tony
• RE: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Rogers, Tony
• Re: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Roberto Chinnici
• Fwd: FW: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? Arthur Ryman
• Re: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Joe Fialli
• RE: LC54 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
• LC77a Namespaced elements and urlformencoded David Orchard
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a David Orchard
• Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• RE: LC54 Proposal David Orchard
• Re: Proposal for Resolution of LC99.: Message Reference Component is Underspecified Arthur Ryman
• Re: Proposal for Resolution of LC99.: Message Reference Component is Underspecified Arthur Ryman
• proposal to add an {action} property to message and fault reference components Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: LC54 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Proposal for LC80: Contribution of Extensions to the Componen t Model Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Asir Vedamuthu

Wednesday, 20 April 2005

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Roberto Chinnici
• RE: LC54 Proposal David Orchard
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• Re: LC54 Proposal Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• RE: Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View David Orchard
• LC54 Proposal David Orchard
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Roberto Chinnici

Tuesday, 19 April 2005

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Ryan Betts
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• CFP: NYC WISE'05 Industry Track Gagnon, Stephane
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth

Monday, 18 April 2005

• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• WSDL 2.0 Primer updated David Booth
• RE: LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names Tom Jordahl
• LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names Arthur Ryman

Saturday, 16 April 2005

• Re: More illumination? ( was RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import) David Booth
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• More illumination? ( was RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import) Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• Proposed changes for Media Types Note Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth

Friday, 15 April 2005

• Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman
• Fw: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Arthur Ryman

Thursday, 14 April 2005

• Re: LC 47 proposed resolution Jacek Kopecky

Friday, 15 April 2005

• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth

Thursday, 14 April 2005

• New Issue: Support of evolution of messages described in Schema 1.0 paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Matt Long
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Glen Daniels
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• Minutes, 14 April 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Glen Daniels
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• RE: Agenda, 15 April 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Refrences editorial action item Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Compromise for formal objections Glen Daniels
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a David Orchard
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Matt Long
• RE: Agenda, 15 April 2005 WS Desc telcon David Orchard
• Probable regrets Bijan Parsia
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth

Wednesday, 13 April 2005

• [draft] Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View Jonathan Marsh
• Agenda, 15 April 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import Martin Gudgin
• Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import David Booth
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Jonathan Marsh
• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support Jonathan Marsh
• Proposal for LC80: Contribution of Extensions to the Component Model Arthur Ryman
• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support Srinivas, Davanum M
• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 12 April 2005

• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support Rogers, Tony
• RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names Arthur Ryman
• Re: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support Arthur Ryman
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Hugo Haas
• LC69b: support for multipart/related serialization in HTTP binding Hugo Haas

Monday, 11 April 2005

• Re: Refrences editorial action item Hugo Haas

Saturday, 9 April 2005

• Re: HTTP Binding example for the Primer Arthur Ryman
• Re: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service Sanjiva Weerawarana

Friday, 8 April 2005

• LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support Hugo Haas
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Hugo Haas
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a paul.downey@bt.com

Thursday, 7 April 2005

• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Rogers, Tony
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a David Orchard
• Re: "Ambiguous" editorial action item David Booth
• Minutes, 7 April 2005 WSDescription WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Refrences editorial action item Jean-Jacques Moreau
• "Ambiguous" editorial action item Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Rogers, Tony
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Hugo Haas
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Agenda, 7 April 2005 WS Desc telcon David Orchard
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a David Orchard
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a David Orchard
• Re: working on part1 editorial action items Hugo Haas
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Hugo Haas
• LC76d follow-up: difference between SOAP header blocks and SOAP modules Hugo Haas
• Issue 107 - Schema for vector, matrix, array paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Rogers, Tony
• Agenda, 7 April 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 5 April 2005

• RE: Yahoo! WebService WSDL Michael Salisbury
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service David Booth

Monday, 4 April 2005

• RE: Primer text for F&P Liu, Kevin
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" David Orchard
• RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service Glen Daniels
• RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service Tom Jordahl
• Re: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) Charlton Barreto
• RE: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) Charlton Barreto
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" paul.downey@bt.com
• Primer text for F&P Glen Daniels

Sunday, 3 April 2005

• working on part1 editorial action items Sanjiva Weerawarana

Saturday, 2 April 2005

• LC 47 proposed resolution David Orchard

Friday, 1 April 2005

• RE: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) David Orchard
• Proposed resolution to LC 77a David Orchard
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" David Orchard
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" David Orchard
• Re: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) Hugo Haas
• RE: HTTP Binding example for the Primer Liu, Kevin
• HTTP Binding example for the Primer David Orchard

Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2005 00:13:21 UTC