Re: Example of Z Notation in WSDL 2.0 Component Model Spec

Hugo,

I am attaching a test file which contains unicode character entities which 
will show you how a lot of the symbols will look in Mozilla.

I am expanding it to include a full comparison of all the alternate 
renderings (e.g. fonts, images, maybe even MathML ) but that is not 
complete yet.



I'm confident that the rendering problem can be solved in several ways.

I suggest we focus the discussion on the bigger issue of whether we should 
augment the English description with a standard, formal, 
machine-checkable, notation.

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/



Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
09/30/2004 07:28 AM

To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc

Subject
Re: Example of Z Notation in WSDL 2.0 Component Model Spec






* Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com> [2004-09-29 13:11-0400]
> Thanks, that works better for me (maybe for others, too), so now at 
least
> I can know what we're talking about (well, except for those imperials
> mispronouncing the word "zee").

I see something, but not the right thing, e.g. "e" instead of "?",
with Firefox 1.0PR under Linux.

Is it possible to see the Unicode version, which BTW is the normative
version we should produce as per my discussions internally at W3C
fulfilling my action item from Toronto. An alternative version with
PNGs is possible if we want to.

BTW, to test how your browser will deal with them, this message will
be archived on lists.w3.org and will contain the rightwards double
arrow character.

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/