- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:34:19 +0200
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2004 08:34:25 UTC
* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2004-09-30 01:01-0700] > I don't quite get how 1a is crisper. Seems like 2) is the way to go for > me. I had the feeling that 1a) was crisper because it was always {http location}'s value combined with {address}'s which generated the Request URI, without messing around with {http location}'s potential template syntax before doing so. It was {http location template} which was the template. Maybe it's not that much crisper indeed, so 2) looks better. -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2004 08:34:25 UTC