- From: Liu, Kevin <kevin.liu@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:25:07 +0100
- To: "'Amelia A Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
>From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org >[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis ... >Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote: >> Amy, I'm at a loss to understand what TIBCO would lose if TIBCO >> were to define the MEP URI too when they publish the binding. > >Recognition, in the WSDL 2.0 specification, that protocols other than >HTTP, based on networking paradigms other than client/server, >are within >the capabilities and design intent of WSDL 2.0. > >I don't think that TIBCO is the only company hoping for such a clearly >marked capability, not even the only WG participant hoping so. +1. Of course any company can define their own MEPs. Such private spec will help their own customers and partners, but has little/no use for other companies that has similar need. Best Regards, Kevin
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 22:25:45 UTC