RE: Issue LC50 - MEPs

As far as I remember, there was a recent vote where it was decided not
to refer to the agent concept in the particular context that the vote
related to. 

I am not aware of any previous decision of avoiding any future reference
to the agent concept, or of avoiding any reference to the WSA document.
(If I missed such a decision, please point it out to me).

Ugo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:12 PM
> To: Ugo Corda; Yalcinalp, Umit; Amelia A Lewis
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Issue LC50 - MEPs
> 
> 
> "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes:
> > 
> > I see that the WS-Addressing WG is currently discussing the idea of 
> > having WS-Addressing's EPRs that support multiple ports: 
> > 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2004Nov/0347.
> > ht
> > ml .
> 
> That's a different problem .. that's about being able to pass 
> around a pointer to a service (endpoint) where that reference 
> may indicate one or more alternate access paths.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
>

Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 15:30:59 UTC