W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Summary, 9-11 Nov 2004 WS Description WG FTF: two objections

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:16:47 -0500
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <20041119161647.21c4ef64.alewis@tibco.com>

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:42:50 +0600
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> Amy, I'm at a loss to understand what TIBCO would lose if TIBCO 
> were to define the MEP URI too when they publish the binding.

Recognition, in the WSDL 2.0 specification, that protocols other than
HTTP, based on networking paradigms other than client/server, are within
the capabilities and design intent of WSDL 2.0.

I don't think that TIBCO is the only company hoping for such a clearly
marked capability, not even the only WG participant hoping so.

Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
Received on Friday, 19 November 2004 21:17:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:45 UTC