- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:15:57 +0100
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20041102171557.GS10844@w3.org>
As per my action item, I am sending a summary of the discussions I had about the publication of our draft with Z notation. First, I was advised to use separate documents for the complete (with Z) and light (without Z) versions rather than using JavaScript. So we'll just have to use a div with the right class in our HTML, and then run an XSLT stylesheet to prune the Z stuff out of it (thus keeping the same section numbers in both versions). Second, with regards to the Z mathematical symbols representation, using the symbol font trick goes against the characher model for the Web[1] and is therefore unacceptable. Moreover, the HTML 4.0 Recommendation has defined character entity references for the Symbol font[2]. If some symbols don't show for some people, I have been given a list of fonts that support a wide range of Unicode symbols: - Arial Unicode MS (comes with MS Office 2000 and later) - Code2000 (free at <http://home.att.net/~jameskass/>) - Lucide Sans Unicode (comes with MS Windows) - Lucide Grande on MacOSX (to be confirmed) It is perfectly acceptable to have in the introduction of our document a note saying that in order to see the document correctly, one needs a decent font with a link to a page where we would give pointers such as the list above. So basically, two versions should suffice: one with Z encoded properly in UTF-8 (or using character entity references, or numeric character references), and one without the Z notation. Cheers, Hugo 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/ 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/sgml/entities.html#sym -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 17:16:06 UTC