- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 22:05:36 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
[Sorry I'm late on this. I worked on it on the plane so many links are
missing.]
Logistics [1].
[1] @@@
--------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday 19 May
--------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Introductions and logistics
- Assignment of scribes
Jeff Mischkinsky, Allen Brookes, Roberto Chinnici, Amy Lewis,
Erik Ackerman, Adi Sakala, Arthur Ryman, Tom Jordahl,
William Vambenepe, Prasad Yendluri, Sanjiva Weerawarana
- Agenda bashing
09:15 Media Type Description Note [2]
- review status, open issues [3, 4], content
- raise issues, next steps
- Goal is to approve pub as Working Draft
[2] @@@
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x161
[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x162
10:45 Break ----------------------------------------
11:00 Issue 72: MTOM support [5]
- Jean-Jacques' proposal for @mediaType, @reinsert [6]
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x72
[6] @@@
11:45 Issue 96: Intermediaries [7]
- Jean-Jacques' proposal for @mustUnderstnad, @relay [6]
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x96
12:30 Lunch ----------------------------------------
13:30 Fault Issues
- Issue 84: SOAP header faults needed? [8]
- Issue 62: Specify a specific SOAP fault code to be
returned [9]
- Issue 114: Name of wsoap:fault/@name [10]
- Issue 68: Confusing description between soap:body and
soap:fault [11]
- Issue 73: Clarify Fault versus Body in SOAP binding [12]
- Issue 29: How to specify the structure and ordering of
'soap:body' parts [13] (Obsolete?)
[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x84
[9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x62
[10] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x114
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x68
[12] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x73
[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x729
15:30 Break ----------------------------------------
15:50 Soap:address Issues
- Issue 31: 'soap:address' insufficient to describe SOAP 1.2
Endpoint [13]
- Issue 52: Allow operation addresses to be absolute [14]
[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x31
[14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x52
17:00 Soap over HTTP Issues
- Issue 28: 'transport' cannot fully describe underlying
SOAP 1.2 protocol binding [15]
- Issue 61: Additional SOAP binding for HTTP
GET-in/SOAP-out [16]
[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x28
[16] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x61
18:00 Adjourn
-------------------------------------------------------
Thursday 20 May
-------------------------------------------------------
08:00 Issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method [20]
- Hugo's original proposal [21]
- DaveO's original proposal [22]
- Hugo's combined proposal [23]
[20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x54
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0042.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0055.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0093.html
10:15 Break ----------------------------------------
10:30 HTTP
- [optimization] properties [24]:
+ HTTP Version
+ Content coding
+ Transfer Codings (Chunked encoding)
+ Caching (Vary, etc.)
+ Content Negotiation ?
- David's original analysis [25]
- David Content coding is more than optimization [26]
- [client requirements] properties [27]:
+ Authentication (and related parameters)
+ SSL
+ Cookies
+ Content Negotiation ?
- David's original analysis [28]
- David's initial proposal [29]
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0019.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0083.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0027.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0020.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0083.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0030.html
12:00 Adjourn
-------------------------------------------------------
13:30 QA Task Force
- TBD
15:30 Adjourn
-------------------------------------------------------
Friday 21 May
-------------------------------------------------------
08:00 SoapAction Issues
- Issue 1: How to specify an empty SOAP action [41]
- Issues 86: New @soapActionURI? [42]
[41] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x1
[42] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x86
10:15 Break ----------------------------------------
10:30 Soap support Issues
- Issue 97: Schema language for SOAP encoding [43]
- Issue 99: Support SOAP 1.2 data model and encoding [44]
- Issue 100: Support SOAP 1.2 RPC [45]
- Issue 101: Support SOAP 1.2 transport binding framework [46]
[43] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x97
[44] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x99
[45] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x100
[46] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x101
12:00 Lunch ----------------------------------------
13:30 Issue 141: Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in
SOAP:Body? [47]
[47] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x141
14:00 Schema inconsistencies
- Issue 19: Inconsistency on optionality of 'soap:headerfault'
- Issue 44: "name" attribute of "soap:fault" is not defined in
schema
- Issue 46: "transport" attribute of "soap:binding" should be
optional
- Issue 47: "soap:operation" should be optional
[48] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x19
[49] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x44
[50] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x46
[51] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x47
15:00 Break ----------------------------------------
15:20 XML 1.1 issues, or TBD
16:00 Adjourn
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 01:10:55 UTC