- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:51:29 -0500
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 13:52:04 UTC
Sanjiva, Looks good. However, I think the main movitation is for QName resolution (as opposed to embedding WSDL fragments in other XML documents), i.e. an XML document may contain no WSDL fragment but instead simply desire to refer to a component via a QName. Also, it might be wothwhile to state that in the list of URI pairs, the namespace MUST be an absolute URI, but the location MAY be relative. If relative then the usual rules apply, i.e. the document must establish a base URI, e.g. the document URI or use XML Base. Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063 intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/ "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 03/22/2004 11:49 AM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute Hi, I've written up the WSDL location attribute stuff; see: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#wsdlloca tion I looked at the description in XSD [1], but that didn't quite seem like the kinda Swahili we want to use. So I came up with a variation. Please help edit/clarify/re-write. Sanjiva. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#schema-loc
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 13:52:04 UTC