- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:07:07 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I think the second sentence adds more confusion than clarification, because it doesn't distinguish optional extensions from mandatory extensions. The second sentence was: [[ The presence of extensibility elements and attributes MAY therefore change the semantics of a WSDL document. ]] I think it would be better to rename the title of 6.3 to "Extensibility and the Component Model" and delete the second sentence, such that 6.3 reads only: [[ 6.3 Extensibility and the Component Model As indicated above, it is expected that the presence of extensibility elements and attributes will result in additional properties appearing in the component model. ]] At 10:43 AM 3/15/2004 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote: >The text added so far is at [1]. If this proves adequate, we can >reassign this issue to part three while awaiting changes there. > >[1] >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#exte >nsibility-semantics. > > -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 20:07:41 UTC