- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:35:04 -0500
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF118E2E59.774BFEFC-ON85256E59.00656FD0-85256E59.00661582@ca.ibm.com>
Sanjiva, Will do. Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063 intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/ "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> 03/16/2004 04:37 AM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org> Subject Re: component designators spec - where art thou? Hi Arthur, Can you please update the component designators spec to be consistent with the new syntax (no <message> etc.)? If you can start with the version that Jonathan pointed to and update that then I can easily merge that in to the draft. Thanks, Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com> To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>; <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:11 AM Subject: Re: component designators spec - where art thou? > Sanjiva, > > I'm not sure what the SHOULD refers to, but the fragment syntax I proposed > now is consistent with Web Architecture since we recommended that > namespace URI's point to WSDL documents. The way this works is as follows: > > 1. register the new content type with IANA. in our case it is > application/wsdl+xml > 2. register/describe the new fragment syntax with the new content type > registration > > Now the algorithm is as follows for intertrepping a URI such as > namespace-uri#fragment > > 1. dereference namespace-uri and get a resource whose content type is > application/wsdl+xml > 2. intepret the fragment as defined by application/wsdl+xml - this > idenitfies a component > > The fragment syntax I proposed was compliant with the XPointer Framework. > The syntax has to be updated to reflect the current state of the spec, but > the general form is component-type(name-path) where component-type is > interface, binding, operation, etc, and name-path is the hierarchical path > formed by the NCNames of the component and its parents, e.g. > operation(myInterface/myOperation). > > Arthur Ryman, > Rational Desktop Tools Development > > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063 > intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/ > > > > "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> > Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > 03/15/2004 10:31 AM > > To > <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > cc > > Subject > component designators spec - where art thou? > > > > > > > > I'd like to fulfill the following: > > EDTODO 2004-03-04: Editors to add back the WSDL Component Designators > back to the spec as SHOULD. > > Arthur? > > > Sanjiva. > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 13:35:38 UTC