- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:49:55 -0800
- To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA202E7D580@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
The SHOULD refers to "authors SHOULD put WSDL at the target namespace URI", IIRC. On all else I concur with Arthur. ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:11 PM To: Sanjiva Weerawarana Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org Subject: Re: component designators spec - where art thou? Sanjiva, I'm not sure what the SHOULD refers to, but the fragment syntax I proposed now is consistent with Web Architecture since we recommended that namespace URI's point to WSDL documents. The way this works is as follows: 1. register the new content type with IANA. in our case it is application/wsdl+xml 2. register/describe the new fragment syntax with the new content type registration Now the algorithm is as follows for intertrepping a URI such as namespace-uri#fragment 1. dereference namespace-uri and get a resource whose content type is application/wsdl+xml 2. intepret the fragment as defined by application/wsdl+xml - this idenitfies a component The fragment syntax I proposed was compliant with the XPointer Framework. The syntax has to be updated to reflect the current state of the spec, but the general form is component-type(name-path) where component-type is interface, binding, operation, etc, and name-path is the hierarchical path formed by the NCNames of the component and its parents, e.g. operation(myInterface/myOperation). Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063 intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/ "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 03/15/2004 10:31 AM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject component designators spec - where art thou? I'd like to fulfill the following: EDTODO 2004-03-04: Editors to add back the WSDL Component Designators back to the spec as SHOULD. Arthur? Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 16:50:31 UTC