clarification on why operations and faults are not qname referencible

• From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
• Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:51:25 +0600
• To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <03f201c40a73$1abbf960$02c8a8c0@watson.ibm.com>

Per action item assigned during the last call:

[NEW] ACTION: editorial clarify 2.4.1 on why no global qname reference
[NEW] ACTION: Editors to clarify 2.4.1 on why no global qname reference

I have changed the draft appropriately for both operations and
faults. See:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#Interfac
eFault
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#Interfac
eOperation

Sanjiva.
p.s.: I had to do it doubly fast since there were two action items
for this one task.

Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 04:52:15 UTC