W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

RE: features & properties: anywhere or only selected places??

From: Liu, Kevin <kevin.liu@sap.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:43:46 +0100
Message-ID: <99CA63DD941EDC4EBA897048D9B0061DA95EC6@uspalx20a.pal.sap.corp>
To: "'Umit Yalcinalp'" <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org

I don't recall the group has ever agreed that F&P can appear under <service>. What's the use case for that?

It's only a few days to our last call, how many of us in the group are confident that he/she fully understand how the WSDL F&P things work. Am I the only one worrying? Since Feature and property are such an important area, I am very concerned that we are making WSDL unnecessarily complicated while only provide a partial solution. 

I am against to expand it to any more element. Instead, I suggest we remove F&P from WSDL2.0, and leave it to other specs where it belongs to.

Best Regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Umit Yalcinalp
Sent: Wednesday, Mar 10, 2004 11:52 AM
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: features & properties: anywhere or only selected places??

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>Hi Guys,
>I was always under the impression that <feature> and <property>
>elements are allowed under any element .. however, the spec
>says otherwise. Did I just get confused?
I guess you mean any component? We definitely need F&P under the service 
element (more precisely ServiceType ;-)) in addition to 
interface/operation/binding/binding operation components.


Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 23:44:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:39 UTC