RE: features & properties: anywhere or only selected places??

I don't recall the group has ever agreed that F&P can appear under <service>. What's the use case for that?

It's only a few days to our last call, how many of us in the group are confident that he/she fully understand how the WSDL F&P things work. Am I the only one worrying? Since Feature and property are such an important area, I am very concerned that we are making WSDL unnecessarily complicated while only provide a partial solution. 

I am against to expand it to any more element. Instead, I suggest we remove F&P from WSDL2.0, and leave it to other specs where it belongs to.

Best Regards,
Kevin
 

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Umit Yalcinalp
Sent: Wednesday, Mar 10, 2004 11:52 AM
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: features & properties: anywhere or only selected places??





Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>Hi Guys,
>
>I was always under the impression that <feature> and <property>
>elements are allowed under any element .. however, the spec
>says otherwise. Did I just get confused?
>
>Sanjiva.
>
>
>  
>
I guess you mean any component? We definitely need F&P under the service 
element (more precisely ServiceType ;-)) in addition to 
interface/operation/binding/binding operation components.

--umit


-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 23:44:46 UTC