- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 00:13:50 +0600
- To: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Committed into editor's draft. Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com> To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:43 PM Subject: RE: Rough text per resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if import/ include fails) > > > +1 > > This sounds good to me. I like text that makes implementations of WSDL > tools behave in a consistent manner. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia > > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of David Booth > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:30 AM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Rough text per resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if import/include > fails) > > > Per today's resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if import/include fails), > here is some rough wording for WSDL Processor conformance section: > > [[ > A conformant WSDL processor MUST fail if it processes an element containing > a wsdl:include statement having a URI that is not dereferenced to a legal > WSDL document. > ]] > > This needs to be refined a little more into spec-ese, but I think it > captures the intent of today's decision. > > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 13:15:07 UTC