www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2004 by date

Friday, 30 July 2004

• WSDL 2.0 part two last call last call Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Proposed revised abstract Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Proposed revised abstract Glen Daniels
• Re: Edits to part 2 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Proposed revised abstract Asir Vedamuthu
• Proposed revised abstract Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Edits to part 2 Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Edits to part 2 Glen Daniels
• Re: Edits to part 2 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Minority objection to features and properties Liu, Kevin

Thursday, 29 July 2004

• RE: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Allen Brookes
• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Glen Daniels
• Re: Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Umit Yalcinalp
• Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon Allen Brookes
• Web page Glen Daniels
• RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits Glen Daniels
• RE: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits Roberto Chinnici
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means David Booth
• RE: Few more (significant) edits Glen Daniels
• on "binding" the AD feature: where does the text go? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Few more (significant) edits Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Few more (significant) edits Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Few more (significant) edits Amelia A Lewis
• FW: Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• Re: Part 2 Features stuff Amelia A Lewis
• Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations Martin Gudgin
• Minority objection to features and properties Martin Gudgin
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means Amelia A Lewis
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means David Booth
• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means Amelia A Lewis
• Minority Opinon re: Compositors [IONA, Oracle, Sonic, Sun] Glen Daniels
• Part 3: Added Application Feature; pending questions (was Re: Review LC drafts now!) Hugo Haas
• Re: Intermediaries? Hugo Haas
• [1st draft] Agenda: 2-4 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 28 July 2004

• Re: pls review text added for what "required" means David Booth
• Intermediaries? David Booth
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Martin Gudgin
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Review LC drafts now! Hugo Haas
• 'ad:mustUnderstand', Schema Annotation Element? (was RE: Few more (significant) edits Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Review LC drafts now! paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Hugo Haas
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) David Booth
• Few more (significant) edits Glen Daniels

Tuesday, 27 July 2004

• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Glen Daniels
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) David Booth
• Part 2 Features stuff Glen Daniels
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. David Booth
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Hugo Haas
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• Review LC drafts now! Jonathan Marsh
• [final] Agenda, 29 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 26 July 2004

• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Anish Karmarkar
• RE: Requiredness (two issues) Glen Daniels
• Re: Requiredness (two issues) Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Requiredness (two issues) Roberto Chinnici
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Glen Daniels
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• RE: help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) David Orchard
• pls review text added for what "required" means Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: paul.downey@bt.com
• Fw: request for clarification on closing issue 211 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 189 proposals: paul.downey@bt.com
• help with incorporating operation name v3 proposal (issue 168) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Sanjiva Weerawarana
• no SOAP binding for in-only operations? :-( Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. David Booth
• Re: Composition model Amelia A Lewis
• Composition model Glen Daniels
• Re: Some new text Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Requiredness (two issues) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Some new text Glen Daniels
• Requiredness (two issues) Glen Daniels
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 189 proposals: Hugo Haas

Friday, 23 July 2004

• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. David Booth
• Re: [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? Hugo Haas
• [Issue 165] Re: What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? Hugo Haas
• RE: Minutes, 22 July 2004 Web Services Description WG telcon Asir Vedamuthu
• What happened about HTTPS in the HTTP binding? Hugo Haas

Thursday, 22 July 2004

• [draft] Agenda, 29 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Minutes, 22 July 2004 Web Services Description WG telcon Ugo Corda
• Minutes, 22 July 2004 Web Services Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• FW: [corrected] Minutes, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Resolution of issue 168 Mark Baker
• SOAP 11 Binding: Strawman Proposal B Asir Vedamuthu
• Schemas for SOAP and HTTP Binding Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [Issue 226] Re: Cross-binding HTTP Features Asir Vedamuthu
• Editorial Issue: Part 3 SOAP Binding Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: [final] Agenda, 22 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Hugo Haas
• HTTP binding: unknown editorial note Hugo Haas
• Re: Resolution of issue 168 Hugo Haas
• [final] Agenda, 22 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Proposed resolution for Issue 206 Umit Yalcinalp
• Proposed Resolution for Issue 205 Umit Yalcinalp
• Proposed resolution for Issue 201 Umit Yalcinalp
• CORRECTION Proposed Resolution for Issue 162 Umit Yalcinalp
• Proposed Resolution for Issue 161: Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Issue 162: Umit Yalcinalp
• Issue 162: Umit Yalcinalp

Wednesday, 21 July 2004

• Re: Property component's dependency on XML Schema Roberto Chinnici
• Re: HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing Hugo Haas
• [Issue 226] Re: Cross-binding HTTP Features Hugo Haas
• RE: HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing Asir Vedamuthu
• HTTP binding mismatch and identification missing Hugo Haas
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Sanjiva Weerawarana

Tuesday, 20 July 2004

• Property component's dependency on XML Schema Roberto Chinnici
• Which came first, the function or the binding? Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Resolution of issue 168 Mark Baker
• Resolution of issue 168 David Booth
• HTTP binding and interface operation MEP Hugo Haas
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Martin Gudgin

Monday, 19 July 2004

• Issue 189 proposals: David Orchard
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Roberto Chinnici
• XMLP Issue 468 closed Hugo Haas
• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Sanjiva Weerawarana

Saturday, 17 July 2004

• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Asir Vedamuthu

Friday, 16 July 2004

• Re: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Minutes, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon David Booth
• [draft] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Mark Nottingham
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. Hugo Haas
• Re: Editorial comments on Part 3 Hugo Haas
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. Hugo Haas
• Re: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? Hugo Haas
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? Asir Vedamuthu

Thursday, 15 July 2004

• Minutes, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Issue 166 - Binding of Faults in HTTP Binding paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 David Booth
• RE: issue 235: definition of Fault paul.downey@bt.com
• issue 235: definition of Fault Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Part 1: Component reference vs. QName paul.downey@bt.com
• Decouple SOAP Version from SOAP Binding ? Asir Vedamuthu
• Part 1: Component reference vs. QName Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: [final] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber

Wednesday, 14 July 2004

• Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized. Marc Hadley
• [final] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Ugo Corda
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Glen Daniels
• FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Savas Parastatidis
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Savas Parastatidis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Savas Parastatidis
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• Some notes on Part 1 Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jim Webber
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Roberto Chinnici

Tuesday, 13 July 2004

• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Savas Parastatidis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 David Booth
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 David Booth
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Part 1: Editorial Issues Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Part 1: Editorial Issues Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• updating/verifying the URI refs section (appendix C) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Tom Jordahl
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Baker
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Martin Gudgin
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Hugo Haas
• Re: AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts Hugo Haas

Monday, 12 July 2004

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana

Tuesday, 13 July 2004

• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Baker
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• discussion style (was: Re: Revised Asynch Binding) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Baker

Monday, 12 July 2004

• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Mark Nottingham
• Re: AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Part 1: Editorial Issues Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Hugo Haas
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding Ugo Corda
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places Tom Jordahl
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Hugo Haas
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Mark Baker

Friday, 9 July 2004

• [draft] Agenda, 15 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• AD Feature: HTTP header conflicts Hugo Haas
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Mark Baker
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Jeffrey Schlimmer
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Prasad Yendluri
• RE: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Jim Webber
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Mark Baker
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp

Thursday, 8 July 2004

• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Mark Baker
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal David Booth
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Prasad Yendluri
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal David Booth
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Prasad Yendluri
• Part 1: Editorial Issues Asir Vedamuthu
• Minutes, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 David Booth
• RE: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Tom Jordahl
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Glen Daniels
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding Ugo Corda
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support paul.downey@bt.com
• "operation name" .. an alternate proposal Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Atom API in WSDL 2.0 Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding paul.downey@bt.com
• Fw: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 David Booth
• Re: Issue 177: XML 1.1 support Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Mark Baker
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp

Wednesday, 7 July 2004

• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jonathan Marsh
• input serialization flexibility David Orchard
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Allowable content in the types element Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jeffrey Schlimmer
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Prasad Yendluri
• Agenda, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Application Data Feature and related stuff Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 6 July 2004

• Issue 189: Binding message content to URI David Orchard
• 169 Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute? David Orchard
• Re: [Draft] Agenda, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding Ugo Corda
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 5 July 2004

• Atom API in WSDL 2.0 David Orchard
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding Ugo Corda
• Issue 233: Dynamically Override Fault Destinations (proposal) Mark Nottingham
• Issue 230: {message label} vs {label} Mark Nottingham
• Allowable content in the types element Mark Nottingham
• Issue 220: Document interface extension semantics Mark Nottingham
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding David Orchard
• Re: Issue 211: Omitting interface messages in bindings Mark Nottingham
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana
• which async binding/operation? (was Revised Asynch Binding) paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Revised Asynch Binding paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Baker

Sunday, 4 July 2004

• Re: Revised Asynch Binding Sanjiva Weerawarana

Saturday, 3 July 2004

• Re: Issue 228 [was RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places] Sanjiva Weerawarana
• New Issue: MTOM/XOP support, probably editorial Umit Yalcinalp
• Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114 Umit Yalcinalp

Friday, 2 July 2004

• Issue 488 closed Anish Karmarkar
• [Draft] Agenda, 8 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Issue 228 [was RE: updated draft to put F&P in more places] Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232] Umit Yalcinalp
• Re: Agenda, 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232] Amelia A Lewis
• Issue 232 [was RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232] Jonathan Marsh
• Re: absolute vs. relative URIs? Amelia A Lewis
• RE: absolute vs. relative URIs? Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: absolute vs. relative URIs? paul.downey@bt.com
• Fw: Minutes, 24 June 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• absolute vs. relative URIs? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 plus 226, 227, 232 Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• Issue 195 [was RE: Features and Properties versus Extensions] Jonathan Marsh
• Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes: 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• How to add links to other documents using xmlspec David Booth
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Mark Nottingham
• Re: Agenda, 1 July 2004 WS Desc telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 Umit Yalcinalp
• Editorial comments on Part 3 Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 paul.downey@bt.com
• Resolution of Issue 489 John Ibbotson
• Re: Action item: HTTP binding for accepts header and output Serialization. Hugo Haas
• Re: Issue 168 (Which Operation?) / Requirement R114 Hugo Haas
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard
• RE: Issue 169: Propose http method in the operation interface to simplify http binding. David Orchard

Last message date: Friday, 30 July 2004 15:37:44 UTC