- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:09:39 -0700
- To: "'Christopher B Ferris'" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
righto. I went down the endpoint rabbit hole for too long. Hence why it changed name to "role", right? :-) Seems like a good thing to describe in the ws-arch work that is documenting the wsdl and soap models. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Christopher B Ferris > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:11 PM > To: David Orchard > Cc: 'Arthur Ryman'; www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ? > > > > Dave, > > SOAP1.2's @role does not specify an endpoint, it specifies a role. An > endpoint can > assume a role, but that is no different than an actor > assuming a character > role > in a play. There can be many actors who play the role and an > actor can > take on multiple roles (even in the same play!) > > http://w3.org/2003/05/ultimateReceiver is not an endpoint > URI, it is a URI > that identifies > a role, nothing more, nothing less. > > There is no spoon, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > phone: +1 508 234 3624 > > www-ws-desc-request@w3.org wrote on 05/27/2003 06:57:26 PM: > > > Wow, my understanding suddenly disappeared. I thought the > @role was > used for specifying an > > endpoint. Should @role now mean service? > > > > This is a very fascinating point, about whether roles mean > endpoints, > services, or targetResources. > > > > Cheers, > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Arthur Ryman > > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:45 PM > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ? > > > > > Jeff, > > > > I think @targetResource is similar in concept to the > ultimate receiver > in the SOAP processing > > model. However, the ultimate receiver might still be a piece of the > processing machinery as > > opposed to identifying the resource associated with the service. > > > > Arthur Ryman, > > > > > > > > > "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> > > Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > > 05/19/2003 09:11 PM > > > > > > To: "Newcomer, Eric" > <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, Arthur > Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, > > <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > > cc: > > Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the value of > wsdl:definitions/wsdl:service/@targetResource relate > to the SOAP 1.2 @role? > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2003 12:38:02 UTC