- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 15:33:27 -0600
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org, w3c-ws-arch@w3.org
- Cc: fallside@us.ibm.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 3:33 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Cc: Bijan Parsia > Subject: [Rev 1] Agenda: 12-14 May 2003 WS Description WG FTF > ------------------------------------------------------- > Wednesday 14 May > ------------------------------------------------------- > 13:30 Begin Joint Session with WS Architecture > Future meetings > IBM/Toronto Arch: July 38-30, Desc: July 30-1 August > ? SAP/Palo Alto Desc: Sept 22-24, Arch: Sept 24-26 > ? Fujitsu/San Francisco Desc: Nov 3-5, Arch: Nov 5-7 > > 13:40 (WSDesc) Single interface per service implications on > (WSArch) "What is a web service?" > > 14:00 OWL Presentation and Demo on OWL, its value in the Web Service > space, its relation to RDF and the RDF mapping WS Desc is > chartered to produce, and its relation to properties and > features. [Bijan Parsia] This is not *exactly* WSA business, but [wearing my XMLP member hat] I took at action item on today's XMLP telcon to follow up on David Fallside's inquiry http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2003May/0008.html and ask your collective help on a bit of a public relations issue that XMLP has: since most people use SOAP via a tool that understands WSDL, the imminent release of SOAP 1.2 might seem a bit "underwhelming" to some until there is a version of WSDL that supports it (and tools that support both). The soapbuilders folks have put out http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/files/soap12WSDL.htm that addresses this issue, and XMLP would like your expert advice on whether this is something that would be a good idea to reference. I beg WSA's indulgence if this is not exactly an architectural issue, but it is important to the collective W3C Web services "story" in my humble opinion. Could we have a few minutes of the joint session next week to discuss this?
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:33:44 UTC