RE: WSDL 1.1 schema question from Jeffrey Schlimmer on 2003-03-25 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from March 2003)

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:03:35 -0800
To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC10AD9D730@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.mi>

+1

> From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com]
> As a tool developer, I find the second class status of the schema to
be a
> bad idea. After all, schema is a precise formal language that supports
> machine processing. My goal as a WG member is that we should provide a
> normative schema since that is unambiguous in comparison with the
narative
> prose in the spec.

Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 14:03:45 UTC