- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: 20 Mar 2003 18:35:54 +0100
- To: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi all, I'm trying here to start fulfilling my action item on relating the SOAP Response MEP with WSDL MEPs (I think this is what the MEP work has transformed my action item into.) "The SOAP Response MEP defines a pattern for the exchange of a non-SOAP message acting as a request followed by a SOAP message acting as a response. In the absence of failure in the underlying protocol, this MEP consists of exactly two messages, only one of which is a SOAP message." [http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#soapresmep] So at the first look, this MEP can be used by operations following the WSDL Request/Response (I think we agreed to add that MEP) pattern. Let's now look at the primary intended usage of this SOAP MEP - it's an HTTP GET request with a response containing a SOAP Envelope. From this point of view, there is only the target URI and the request message as such is empty. Therefore, in the cases where there are no parameters marshaled in the URI, the SOAP Response MEP could also be used by operations following the output-only WSDL MEP. I suggest that our SOAP binding support mapping request/response operations onto the SOAP Response MEP (probably using some way of marshaling the request message into the request URI for HTTP GET - I think the URI replacement algorithm should fit here); and I also suggest that our SOAP binding support mapping output-only operations onto the SOAP Response MEP, thus enriching the current capabilities of our SOAP binding. 8-) Best regards, Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation http://www.systinet.com/
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 12:36:03 UTC