- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:32:45 -0700
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Yes, this applies to section 1.1 too. No decisions were finalized at the telcon. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:10 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Minutes of W3C WSDWG Conference Call, June 26th, 2003 > > Does this apply to section 1.1 too (i.e. no conclusion reached, so keep > the figure and text)? > > BTW, I have a correction for the minutes: I indicated during the call > that, if we were to drop the figures, we should keep revert to the > previous version of the text and not simply drop the text alltogether. > The current text is a revamp of earlier text, which was existed long > before the Rennes F2F. > > Jean-Jacques. > > Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > > David wrote: > > > >>Gotcha, sorry for my confusion. I was asking about > >>"<sanjiva> JM point 1: anyone against removing @targetResource > >><sdl-scribe> no one on call seems to object". > > > > > > No one on the call objected. Some pointed out that others not on the > > call were likely to object. And some thought that we first needed to > > revisit the single-interface-per-service decision before deciding it. > > So we didn't actually get a resolution although we were close :-). It's > > hard to take full and accurate minutes on a fast-paced and varied > > discussion like we had today. >
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 13:32:56 UTC