- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:43:27 +0600
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > > I said that in David's example there are 3000 Printer Services that are > distinguished only by the different targetResources. If the services are indeed operating on different printers that would have to be the case. Note that the <service> QName would also have to be different. How would you design that in WSDL 1.1? You would have to have different services too and it would look the same, except that there wouldn't be a targetResource attribute to indicate the resource. What that allows is *another* service to say its messing with the same resource. One can of course define a printer service in which every operation takes the printer as an argument. In that case one wouldn't need different services .. the printer is part of the input. There are different ways of defining interfaces obviously. This is nothing new from WSDL - this is the way with any language. Sanjiva.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2003 01:43:18 UTC