- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:20:05 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 06:38:19AM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote: > Not every resource identifier is a reasonable value for a WSDL > targetResource, but there is a fairly broad range of URIs that make sense, > so leveraging the TAG's definition *with the qualifier* that it is a "WSDL > target" resource makes perfect sense to me. There's enough substantive > disagreement over this concept and whether it is valuable to WSDL that I > don't think worrying about the finer points of terminology is productive at > the moment. Well, that finer point of terminology seemed to be responsible for confusing several people, including some Web services proponents. So I respectfully disagree that it isn't worth worrying about. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 09:15:42 UTC