- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:59:22 -0700
- To: "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
OK thanks, fixed that in the upcoming revision. > -----Original Message----- > From: Savas Parastatidis [mailto:Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:27 PM > To: Jonathan Marsh; Sanjiva Weerawarana; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: RE: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description WG FTF > > Jonathan, > > The message to which you referred contained the wrong attachment. In the > same thread, Jim sent the correct version of the document that included > our proposal. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0021.html > > The proposal was about a declarative way to expose supported or required > functionality in a WSDL interface. We were not aware of the properties > and features TF when we wrote and sent that document. Although we still > believe that our proposal is simpler than the current > features/properties approach, we are glad that WSDL will provide this > kind of functionality in some form. That is why we didn't pursue this > further. > > If the WSDL WG still decides to consider our proposal, we would be happy > to provide more information. > > Regards, > -- > Savas Parastatidis > http://savas.parastatidis.name > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] > > Sent: 25 July 2003 21:59 > > To: Sanjiva Weerawarana; www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: RE: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description WG > FTF > > > > > > We really haven't had any meaningful discussion on this proposal yet. > > The proposal is from Jim Webber (non-WG member) and spun off of the > > Issue 2 discussion, which is why I've been tracking it. Time > allowing, > > it would be good to get an overview from a WG member who has reviewed > it > > and see if we there is enough interest to develop a champion to > further > > it within the WG. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > > On > > > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:20 PM > > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > > Subject: Re: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description > WG > > FTF > > > > > > > > > "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> writes: > > > > - Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in > WSDL > > > > [.3]. > > > > > > > .. > > > > [.3] > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0020.html > > > > > > I must've missed this discussion as I don't remember it at all. > > > > > > Is this basically in the space of properties & features and thus > > > also WS-Policy*? WS-Policy in particular has stuff like supported, > > > rejected etc. hence the question. > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > >
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 14:59:30 UTC