W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2003

RE: Value of @processContents: Recommend "strict"

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:21:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB0422B8B0@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: "'Martin Gudgin'" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

> processContents='lax' seems to be the 'sweet spot' here as it 
> allows me to validate a WSDL document even if I don't have 
> schemas for all the extensions therein. I don't want 
> validation to fail just because I don't have an extension schema.

+1 - validate where you can, don't worry where you can't, and wsdl:required tells you where you better not fail to grok things.  Seems right to me.

Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:21:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:32 UTC