Re: Can someone recap the differences between @serviceGroup vs. definitions-targetNamespace ? from Mark Baker on 2003-07-16 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2003)

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:16 -0400
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030716141716.V4241@www.markbaker.ca>

FWIW, I agree with Jeff's premise that serviceGroup doesn't serve the
purpose I believed it was supposed to serve; as a replacement for
targetResource.  IMO, serviceGroup group semantics should be equivalent
to the group semantics of targetResource.

It was also my understanding that these semantics were implicit in the
multiple-interface-per-service so serviceGroup would help there too, but
I'm not 100% sure that this is the case.

Mark.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 02:36:38PM -0700, Jeff Mischkinsky wrote:
> Personally, I thought the notion that we have of targetResouce served a 
> useful purpose in many, many cases. I can't see any real world useful 
> purpose in this notion of service group. as currently defined.

-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 14:11:09 UTC