- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:16:47 +0100
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Paco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
I like the general direction this is going. My major comment is the distinction between messages and contexts, which percolates down to the lowest level (binding). Maybe we could try to generalize messages/parts so they could (also) be attached to portTypes and bindings directly? Contexts would then become a constituent part of messages and the general soap:header syntax would also be usable for binding contexts. Other than this, I have a number of smaller suggestions: * s/ref/uri/ * inputContexts and outputContexts as elements rather than attributes * encodingStyle to contain a single URI only Jean-Jacques. Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > Attached is a $subject. This relates to the features and properties > discussion as it seems to me that features are similar to policies > as described in WS-Policy [1] and properties are similar to the > contexts described in this proposal. Unfortunately I won't be > able to be on the phone during this discussion .. > > [1] http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-polfram/ > > Bye, > > Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 10:17:36 UTC