Re: write-up of interaction patterns

What it there are three (or mode) nodes instead of just two. How 
would we differentiate between the different "client" nodes?

Jean-Jacques.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> But I thought we all agreed at some F2F that WSDL was always
> describing the server's perspective. If that agreement still
> holds then the "what node am I" issue is not there .. the WSDL
> description of the MEP always takes the role of the "server"
> of the MEP.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
> To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
> Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:06 AM
> Subject: Re: write-up of interaction patterns
> 
> 
> 
>>Either syntax is fine with me, as long as we can carry the
>>information described by Glen below.
>>
>>Jean-Jacques.
>>
>>Glen Daniels wrote:
>>
>>>When you lay this into WSDL, I think you need both "what node am I" and
> 
> "what
> 
>>>messages in the WSDL correspond to what messages in the MEP description.
> 
> An
> 
>>>example of this would be as follows (using my preferred syntax, natch
> 
> :)):
> 
>>><operation mep="request-response-uri" role="node-B-uri">
>>>  <input message="someMessage" role="Request"/>
>>>  <output message="otherMessage" role="Response"/>
>>></operation>
> 
>

Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 06:02:22 UTC