- From: Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:38:23 -0500
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF0EA859CA.258C9982-ON85256CB4.0008D80D@us.ibm.com>
My initial response as markup on Sanjiva's document. (See attached file: interaction-patterns-jan-18-2003.sgg.html) In general I prefer the approach suggested by Sanjiva. However, I am not keen on introducing the event notion in WSDL 1.2. I continue to prefer WSDL 1.2 to have fewer new features and be spec'd sooner! sgg ++++++++ Steve Graham sggraham@us.ibm.com (919)254-0615 (T/L 444) Emerging Technologies ++++++++ "Sanjiva Weerawarana" To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> <sanjiva@watson.i cc: bm.com> Subject: updated interaction patterns proposal Sent by: www-ws-desc-reque st@w3.org 01/18/2003 02:31 AM I have updated the interaction patterns proposal to be based on the proposal to remove the <message> construct. Also fixed the bug that Prasad pointed out .. <fault> was missing from the input/output pattern. Sanjiva. #### interaction-patterns-jan-18-2003.html has been removed from this note on January 19, 2003 by Steve Graham
Attachments
- text/html attachment: interaction-patterns-jan-18-2003.sgg.html
Received on Sunday, 19 January 2003 22:05:03 UTC