W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2003


From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:17:43 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF0FFF1E68@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Following the call yesterday, i'm confused why we would need to invent a new
schema language just to represent section 5 encoded messages when it's just
a flag ATM. 

I'm also puzzled how other, non-XML serialisations for SOAP could be
supported in the future - i'm guessing you'd need to invent a whole new 
SOAP binding ?

Can someone please point me at the reasoning how we lost the encodingStyle
on the SOAP binding ?


Paul Sumner Downey
Web Services Integration
BT Exact
+44(0)1442 296260
Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 06:17:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:36 UTC