W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2003

Issue clarify-type-and-element: can we close?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:15 -0800
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA202011C77@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Issue clarify-type-and-element [1], titled "Clarify use of type= and
element= in part with XML Schema experts" states "The question is
whether we can just have element and still retain full abstraction or if
not whether we can just have type and live."

With the removal of the message construct, Interface Operations now have
Message References, which in turn have a property:
  {message} A reference to an XML element declaration
and the corresponding message attribute.

Since @type and @element described in this issue have been dropped from
the schema, and we now refer solely to XML element declarations, this
issue appears to be obsolete.

Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2003 16:20:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:36 UTC