W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2003

RE: Suggest TAG/WSD WG liaison meeting at tech plenary

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:58:58 -0800
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA201EF0D2D@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Sorry for the delay in replying.

I believe the WG would find significant value in meeting with the TAG at
the TP.  While the topics you mention below are currently of interest,
it may be that they have been resolved by the time we meet, or replaced
by new issues.  We should plan for joint time, but come up with a final
agenda of topics (I'm sure there will be plenty) closer to the date.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> Behalf Of David Orchard
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:37 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Suggest TAG/WSD WG liaison meeting at tech plenary
> Hi all,
> I'd like to suggest a joint WSD/TAG liaison meeting at the tech
> The TAG has discussed doing liaison and is specifically attending the
> plenary week to allow these kinds of interactions.
> There are some areas that seem like f2f time would be useful, and I
> suggest them as topics:
> 1. WSDL abstract components and fragment identifier syntax, TAG
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
> 2. Marking operations as safe.
> Perhaps a couple hours would suffice for some high quality f2f time on
> these topics?  Is this interesting?  Are there any other topics the
> would like to discuss f2f with the TAG?
> Cheers,
> Dave
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:00:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:36 UTC