- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:18:43 -0800
- To: "'Jonathan Marsh'" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00b101c3b9d2$449bfc90$d902200a@beasys.com>
Oh, i'm sorry. I'd like this raised as an issue and an ideal resolution would be to add this as a requirement. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:13 AM > To: Jean-Jacques Moreau; David Orchard > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: RE: Marking WSDL operations as "safe", in scope requirement? > > > Pinging David Orchard again, we're unsure whether to treat > this as a new > issue. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > On > > Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 6:58 AM > > To: David Orchard > > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Marking WSDL operations as "safe", in scope > requirement? > > > > > > David, > > > > This issue was briefly discussed before [3], but did not (yet?) make > it > > into the issues list. > > > > Are you raising this as a new issue? > > > > Jean-Jacques. > > > > [3] > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0013.html> > > > > David Orchard wrote: > > > > > I haven't been able to tell from the drafts, and my apologies for > that, > > > whether WSDL 2.0 supports marking operations as "safe" or not. I > think > > this > > > hasn't been addressed yet in the bindings work, but I could be > wrong. > > I > > > don't quite see this as a standalone requirement in [1] > though R125 > > comes > > > close. Is there intention to support this as part of the bindings > work? > > > > > > As background, I ask this as this was a suggestion of the > TAG in the > TAG > > > issue 7 finding [2]. The extracted text is "However, to represent > > safety in > > > a more straightforward manner, it should be a property of > operations > > > themselves, not just a feature of bindings." > > > > > > FWIW, I have also heard some customers want this functionality as > they > > don't > > > have a standardized "ping" message so they want to use a safe > request > > and > > > need a way of knowing. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dave > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/ > > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet.html > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 14:18:59 UTC