- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 21:02:06 +0600
- To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1; asynch is such a loaded word that its best to avoid it as much as possible. Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com> To: "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:12 AM Subject: Proposal: rename "asynch-output-input" > > I made a misstep in naming one of the added patterns, using the term > "asynch" because I couldn't, at the time, think of a better > distinguisher. > > A name that better fits the pattern used throughout part two would be: > "output-optional-input". That is, output followed by (optional) input. > This helps distinguish it from the output-input pattern (where input is > required), but does not give the (misleading) impression that it can > only be used in an asynchronous environment (although it *is* true that > using output-optional-input in a synchronous environment is a bear with > cubs). > > Amy! > -- > Amelia A. Lewis > Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. > alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 10:01:56 UTC