- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:39:03 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:27:35PM -0400, Amelia A. Lewis wrote: > [snip religious doctrine] I'll thank you to keep comments like that to yourself next time. > You can do whatever you want, but it isn't defined as such in the JMS spec, whereas retrieval of addresses *is*. My contention is simple: a web services description language ought to be able to describe current technologies. It should not be restricted to only technologies redefined or wrapped in REST-compatible services. Did you realize that I was describing how I would go about "URIfying" some information space that I asked you for? I also described how JMS doesn't define an information space (unlike an application protocol), since it's just a *transport* protocol. Nevermind. You don't really seem interested in learning what I have to say. I'll just submit an issue. Ciao. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 14:42:14 UTC