- From: <info@johanpeeters.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
- To: jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com
- Cc: mrbannon@uwaterloo.ca, www-ws-desc@w3.org
There has been some discussion at the OASIS WSS TC about QoP (Quality of Protection) which I would consider as a subset of QoS. My understanding is that they are currently thinking of introducing a new binding, secure SOAP, that would have extensions allowing you to specify the QoP. Is this the way to go? I personally would hope for a more orthogonal definition of QoP (and other QoS aspects for that matter). I.e. a QoP can apply to a web service regardless of whether its wire format is SOAP or not. It seems to me that WS-Policy might just do that. But that is by-the-by. What I really want to know is this: what are the respective responsibilities of the W3C WS description WG and the OASIS WSS TC working group wrt QoP/QoS descriptions and how will the pieces ever fit together? Will a WSDL 1.2 specification tell us, for example, whether a secure SOAP message is required to access a service? What if the binding is not SOAP? kr, Yo On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:11:18 -0700, "Jeffrey Schlimmer" wrote: This really hasn’t been discussed within the WG yet. However, as you point out, it could be done via extensibility elements – where allowed in WSDL 1.1 and pretty much everywhere in WSDL 1.2. I suspect that WS-Policy etc would be another interesting alternative. --Jeff From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Ryan Bannon Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 10:50 AM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Thanks for your response Jeff. If I understand WSDL properly, one could allow for QoS to be represented in a WSDL file by using extensibility options. While it may not have been formally discussed on w3c.org, is this currently the preferred way for applying QoS descriptions to WSDL files? (I assume there must be some discussion on this...) Or am I just totally confused? :) Thanks, Ryan ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer To: Michael Ryan Bannon Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 10:56 PM Subject: RE: Quality of Service Ryan, the following requirement has been accepted by the W3C Web Services Description Working Group (WG), but the WG hasn’t as yet discussed any proposals for meeting that requirement. R117 The description language SHOULD allow specifying QoS-like policies and mechanisms of a Web Service. For instance, an indication of how long it is going to take a Web Service to process the request. (From WG discussion. Last discussed 12 April 2002.) http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/ --Jeff From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Ryan Bannon Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 9:49 AM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Hi, Long time listener...but I don't post much. I've got a question about QoS in WSDL 1.2. I've gone over the 1.2 specs and there doesn't seem to be any fucntionality offered by WSDL directly for describing the QoS for a web service. Is there a practice for defining QoS within 1.2? Does one have to use the extensibility options? Thanks, Ryan Johan Peeters Software Architecture Services +32 16 649000
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 16:54:46 UTC