Re: FnP for HTTP binding and SOAP HTTP binding

Sounds good. In principle, we should be able to reuse the SOAP 
1.2 Web Method for the (WSDL) HTTP binding, and so not invent a 
new URI. However, the description of the SOAP Web Method feature 
seems to be SOAP specific[1].

JJ.

[1] 
<http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html#WebMethodFeature>

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> issue: Do we need to invent a new uri for for the HTTP binding feature?
> 
> Well, not really, but it would be good if people don't associate
> systematically the SOAP Web Method Feature with SOAP itself. They may do
> since the uri provided in the SOAP specification contains "soap". It's
> more a feature that needs to be attached to HTTP itself but the URI used
> does not reflect that enough imho.
> 
> issue: and what about the HTTP headers?
> 
> How useful would it be? The accept, accept-ranges, content-type,
> authorization, cache-control, connection and content-length are already
> fixed by other means (security, authorization features). accept-language
> has nothing to do in the WSDL. Do we have an example of an header that
> needs to be fixed and should not be represented in a more abstract way?
> 
> Philippe
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 12:18:17 UTC