- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: 10 Apr 2003 08:36:24 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Following http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0068.html here is an example of a decorated XML tree. I included an example using feature and property as well. <wsdl> <message name="getImageInput"> <part name='name' type='xsd:string'/> </message> <message name="getImageOutput"> <part name="image" mimeType="image/jpeg"/> </message> <interface name="ImageInterface"> <operation name="getImage"> <input name="getImageInput"/> <output name="getImageOutput"/> </operation> </interface> <!-- Here, we have two differents ways: one using our open content model, one using features and properties: --> <!-- using the open content model --> <binding name='ImageInterfaceHttp1' type='s:ImageInterface'> <!-- do we want the verb per binding or per operation? Having per binding, requires to write two binding to map one method to GET and the other to POST --> <http:binding verb='GET'/> <operation name="getImage"> <http:operation location='images/(name).jpg'/> <input> <!-- all part are included in the uri, only section 1.1 applies. no need for further information will produce: .../images/bear.jpg --> </input> <output> <!-- mime type is included in the part, section 1.3.2.1.1 applies. (note that this section contains a bug regarding the mime type from section introduction 1.3.2.1). no need for further information. --> </output> </operation> </binding> <!-- the same binding, but using the features and properties model --> <binding name='ImageInterfaceHttp2' type='s:ImageInterface'> <feature name="http://www.example.org/2003/03/http/web-method"/> <property name='http://www.example.org/2003/03/http/web-method/method'> GET </property> <operation name="getImage"> <property name='http://www.example.org/2003/03/http/web-method/location'> images/(name).jpg </property> <input/> <output/> </operation> </binding> <!-- for the rest of the example, I'll use the open content model --> <!-- same interface, but this time using the url encoded mechanism --> <binding name='ImageInterfaceHttp'> <http:binding verb='GET'/> <operation name="getImage"> <http:operation location='images'/> <input> <!-- no parts are in the operation location, so let's map them using section 1.2.2 will produce: .../images?name=bear --> <http:urlEncoded/> </input> <output/> </operation> </binding> <!-- same interface, but this time using HTTP POST --> <binding name='ImageInterfaceHttp'> <http:binding verb='POST'/> <operation name="getImage"> <http:operation location='images/(name).jpg'/> <input> <!-- all part are included in the uri, only section 1.1 applies. no need for further information will produce: .../images/bear.jpg --> <http:urlEncoded/> </input> <output/> </operation> </binding> <!-- same interface, but this time using HTTP POST --> <binding name='ImageInterfaceHttp'> <http:binding verb='POST'/> <operation name="getImage"> <http:operation location='images'/> <!-- we always use application/x-www-form-urlencoded --> <input/> <!-- same reply as in the HTTP GET binding --> <output/> </operation> </binding> Philippe
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 08:36:25 UTC