- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: 12 Oct 2002 17:59:49 +0200
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Don Mullen <donmullen@tibco.com>, Amy Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>, WS Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Chris,
having read your first paragraph, I thought you were going to suggest
something like
<wsdl:types>
<xs:include .../>
</wsdl:types>
or even
<wsdl:definitions>
<xs:include .../>
</wsdl:definition>
I think this would make type system extensibility in WSDL play nicely
with the rest of WSDL extensibility; working the same way, really.
What do you think?
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 01:28, Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> Jacek's points are well taken. Why not then leverage xs:include as that
> would
> seem to be more approriate given Jacek's points.
>
> e.g.
> <wsdl:types>
> <xs:schema ...>
> <xs:include
> schemaLocation="http://example.org/yadda/mystuff.xsd"/>
> </xs:schema>
> </wsdl:types>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> phone: +1 508 234 3624
>
Received on Saturday, 12 October 2002 11:59:51 UTC