- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:02:32 -0700
- To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
- Cc: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Good catch. REQUIREMENT R067 The description language MUST have adequate points of extension in its constructions. (From WG discussion. Last discussed 12 Apr 2002.) COMMENT R067 uses the term "points of extension", which should perhaps be defined (I don't know what it means). RECOMMENDATION Reword: "The description language MUST allow for extension in description language components, including at least message, port type, binding, and service." --Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Amelia A Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:32 AM To: Jeffrey Schlimmer Cc: WS-Desc WG (Public) Subject: RE: comments on WS Desc Requirements draft of 29 April 2002 On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 11:22, Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: [snip] > REQUIREMENT > R067 > The description language MUST have adequate points of extension in its > constructions. (From WG discussion. Last discussed 12 Apr 2002.) > > COMMENT > R067 uses the term "points of extension", which should perhaps be > defined (I don't know what it means). > > RECOMMENDATION > Reword: "The description language MUST allow for extension in Did something get eaten? Rest of the sentence providing the rewording? Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 12:03:05 UTC