- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 14:24:04 +0200
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- CC: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Just added the following ednote. How does this sound? --JJ
<ednote>
<name>JJM</name>
<date>20020628</date>
<edtext>This document is out of synch with Part 1.
A number of changes have been made recently to Part 1
which are not yet reflected in this document. The WG
is aware of this problem and expects to synchronise
Part 1 and Part 2 at a later date. More generally,
the sections in this document have hardly changed
from the corresponding sections in WSDL 1.1. This
may not be the case in a future revision.
In particular, the WG anticipates
that the SOAP section may change significantly
as a result of supporting SOAP 1.2.
</edtext>
</ednote>
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> JJM: Please remember to put an ed-note on the part2 doc saying
> it needs to be updated for this case too. (If you have one overall
> one saying the part2 doc may not be fully up-to-date yet that's fine.)
> In some sense the getting overall feedback on part1 is most critical
> at this stage as we can adapt part2 to fit accordingly later ..
Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 08:24:40 UTC