- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:46:12 +0600
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> writes: > > A more accurate way to state my understanding is that the > issue-operation-overloading is closed by removing the feature, and a new > issue has arisen: > > issue-transition-documentation: Do we need to provide user > documentation describing the transition between WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 1.2? > If so, what form should such documentation take? The removal of > operation overloading and advice on how to restructure a WSDL 1.1 file > that relies on this feature are an example. Thanks for clarifying this Jonathan- I agree 100% this is the consensus we reached on the call. > It would be nice if this were resolved prior to publication if this view > does represent the consensus of the WG, but is not a showstopper if > someone feels these issues cannot be cleanly separated. I will update the part1 doc accordingly, if someone has a major issue with it speak up now or hold your peace! Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 22:52:36 UTC